
In anticipation of the Spring Statement, we sat down with Specialist Partner Andy to assess what clients should focus on ahead of the statement and the Budget later this year.
I’ve spent most of my career working in economic and fiscal policy in the UK. Between 1998 and 2013, I was in and out of the Treasury, ending up running the Fiscal Policy team for the Coalition’s first budget in June 2010 and then the Macroeconomic Coordination & Strategy team for the next couple of years. I spent the decade from 2013 at the Office for Budget Responsibility, first as Robert Chote’s chief of staff, then as a member of the executive Budget Responsibility Committee, focused on fiscal issues and estimating the impact of Budget policy measures. In quiet moments, I’ve spent time working with Finance Ministries in many countries across Africa and Asia with the IMF, and have recently worked with the Grantham Institute at the London School of Economics on the intersection between climate challenges and fiscal policy.
This is going to be a busy year on the domestic economic policy front. The Spring Statement was meant to be a quiet forecast update but looks set to be a ‘fiscal event’, with the Chancellor cutting spending to stay on track to meet her fiscal targets. The Spending Review looked tough with the need to squeeze most departments’ budgets to find extra money for the NHS, but now looks even tougher thanks to additional needs for defence spending. That’s a difficult backdrop for the Industrial Strategy, too, which is due in the coming months. And if fiscal pressures continue to mount, the Autumn Budget could involve uncomfortable decisions on tax.
Against this backdrop, three things for clients to keep in focus include:
I lead our economic modelling offer – from policy analysis to economic impact assessments and more. These involve building evidence to support clients’ positions, be they the economic value of existing activities or benefit-cost ratios for proposed investments, the economic and fiscal impact of policy proposals, or evaluating economic scenarios exploring future trends like AI or the energy transition. As with everything at Flint, we marry our analysis with an understanding of the political and policy context – often using modelling approaches that are tailored to match those used inside government so that they are recognised and trusted by policymakers.
Engaging with political and official-level policymakers involves putting yourself in their shoes. What information do they need? What trade-offs are they having to make? That involves lots of things: political judgements, polling, parliamentary handling, administrative delivery, and, importantly, an attempt to understand what works or what impact a policy change will have. That’s where economic modelling comes in. There is huge value in being able to enter a conversation with policymakers with a good idea of what evidence they’ll want to see and what answers they’re likely to get when government analysts look into your issue.
Do your best to find the right answer, which is not necessarily the most positive answer or biggest number. Policymakers receive lots of studies with inflated results and can spot where businesses have missed important parts of government-stipulated methodologies.
At Flint we are committed to helping our clients achieve their goals. We’d be happy to discuss how we can tailor our services to meet your specific needs. Get in touch with us to learn more!