
The September state elections could mark a watershed in German politics, with the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) leading strongly in Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and potentially entering state government for the first time. The immediate impact of AfD victories on federal policymaking would be limited. Politically, however, strong AfD gains would intensify pressure on the CDU, SPD and Chancellor Merz, adding to the domestic headwinds facing the government as it seeks to push through difficult reforms to pensions, long-term care, and taxation.
Three state elections will take place in September: Saxony-Anhalt on the 6th, followed by Berlin and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania on the 20th. Apart from Berlin, the AfD is leading the polls by a wide margin and may appoint the head of government in a federal state for the first time.
Germany’s established parties have so far ruled out entering a coalition with the AfD, leaving it politically isolated despite its strong polling. In Berlin, a three-party coalition is likely, potentially led by either the left-populist Die Linke or the centre-right CDU, with the Social Democrats (SPD) and the Greens as coalition partners.
The situation is different in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Saxony-Anhalt, where the AfD currently polls at around 36 and 42 per cent respectively. Depending on how many parties clear the 5 per cent threshold for entry into parliament, the AfD could secure a majority of seats, particularly in Saxony-Anhalt, or seek to form a minority government.
Alternatively, governments led by Minister-President Manuela Schwesig (SPD) in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Minister-President Sven Schulze (CDU) in Saxony-Anhalt could continue. However, this would require some form of cooperation between the CDU and the Left Party, an option that remains highly controversial within the CDU.
Since its founding in 2012 as an anti-Euro party, the AfD has gone through successive shifts towards more radical positions. This distinguishes it from other successful non-mainstream parties in Germany and elsewhere in Europe, which have gradually moved towards centrist positions as they came closer to power.
At federal level, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has classified the AfD as a confirmed far-right extremist organisation (although legal challenges are ongoing). In Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD is similarly classified, while in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, it is being monitored.
The AfD is also unusually isolated at the European level. In the European Parliament, it belongs to neither Patriots for Europe nor the European Conservatives and Reformists. Instead, it leads the smaller, marginal “Europe of Sovereign Nations” group. it remains decidedly pro-Russia and maintains positions that support Russia’s anti-Western and anti-Ukrainian narrative.
The three federal states have a combined population of 7.4 million - less than 10% of Germany’s population. Their elections are nevertheless attracting significant national and international attention because an AfD win would set a historical precedent.
The immediate impact on federal policymaking would be limited. In the Bundesrat (the second legislative chamber in which the states are represented) Berlin and Saxony-Anhalt have 4 votes each, whilst Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has 3 out of a total of 65. CDU, SPD and Green governed states would therefore continue to hold a comfortable majority.
An AfD-led government could nevertheless complicate cooperation between the federal states, particularly in areas such as education and domestic security. The latter could become especially sensitive if the AfD were in a position to appoint a state interior minister with authority over the policy and state Offices for the Protection of the Constitution.
The broader political implications could be immense:
The September elections will therefore also serve as a verdict on the federal government and its senior leadership. Poor results for the governing parties would further weaken Merz, Klingbeil and Bas and could materially constrain the government’s ability to pursue difficult reforms to pensions, long-term care and taxation. Such reforms require political authority and broad support within the governing parties, particularly where they impose costs on their own constituencies.
For businesses and investors, three implications stand out:
Companies and investors should therefore monitor developments closely. The Flint Germany team is on hand to provide further analysis and support.
The Flint Global Germany team advises companies and investors across Germany and Europe on political, regulatory and competition issues, combining in-country expertise with a global perspective to help clients anticipate and navigate complex decision-making environments.
Das Flint Global Germany Team berät Unternehmen und Investoren in Deutschland und Europa zu politischen und regulatorischen Herausforderungen. Unser Beratungsansatz verbindet fundierte lokale Expertise mit einer internationalen Perspektive. Wir unterstützen unsere Mandanten dabei, komplexe regulatorische Entwicklungen und politische Entscheidungsprozesse frühzeitig zu erkennen, einzuordnen und in klare Handlungsschritte zu übersetzen.
Get in touch with our Berlin team
Enjoyed this blog? Sign up for our EU Monthly newsletter for analysis of the most important policy and political developments across the European Union.